From year group to sub-topic
Subject → year → topic → sub-topic → a ready set of activities assembled by a curriculum lead. The teacher does not hunt for tasks one by one.
Not a list of features, but what changes in the school’s work: the teacher does not assemble the lesson, children do not lose half of it logging in, parents see progress, and the owner sees the money.
Subject → year → topic → sub-topic → a ready set of activities assembled by a curriculum lead. The teacher does not hunt for tasks one by one.
Run it as it is. Change the number of questions inline. Or open the full difficulty panel — range, step, mode. It works the same for any source of the task.
A lesson that worked is saved as a set and reused whole next time. The set belongs to the school, not to one teacher: the curriculum lead prepares, everyone else takes.
One object with a different deadline. In class everyone gets identical questions — otherwise the board compares things that are not comparable. At home everyone gets their own — otherwise they copy.
Position, name, what the student is solving, a progress bar. Readable from the back row. Whoever is stuck is highlighted separately — that is who the teacher walks over to.
The lesson ends with a podium on the board, not a table with a “weak area” column. The rest of the class is named too — the celebration is not for three children.
The content is fixed by the standard; how it is explained is chosen by the school’s curriculum lead. The school gets its own handwriting without commissioning its own content.
From an object model to a picture and only then to a number. The child builds a concept rather than memorising a result.
12 domains, ~285 task types, progression across Years 1–4. The same standard TIMSS Math looks at.
A task is understood from visuals and audio. Russian and Kazakh work without loss of meaning; the interface runs in three languages.
Everything is calculated on its own, immediately: accuracy, the topics where the class dipped and a breakdown for every child. The teacher only has to look and decide who to go over to.
The rule changes in one place and applies to the whole catalogue. It cannot be bypassed from the browser: the client sends facts, not a finished score.
How many children take the subject, who stopped logging in and how long ago, what each teacher’s workload is. There is deliberately no school-wide average attainment here: nothing can be done with it.
The school uploads a ready class list together with parents. First a line-by-line preview: who will be created, who is skipped, where the error is. Passwords print on a sheet and are handed out by class.
On 1 September classes are not rewritten: last year’s “1A” stays with its results, while the roster moves into “2A” in one click. Leavers are not promoted and are counted separately.
Your logo and brand colour apply everywhere in one save. Readability is calculated by the system: a colour picked by eye fails contrast, and it is children on tablets who pay for that.
A school subdomain is included; your own domain is connected separately. The app installs on a parent’s phone with the school’s name and icon, without App Store or Google Play.
The head organisation sees figures for every branch in one view. The names of children in a neighbouring school stay inaccessible — only aggregate numbers.
Servers and storage are on national territory. For schools that need the code on their own infrastructure there is a one-off licence.
Organisation isolation is verified with direct queries at every step, rather than relying on hidden buttons in the interface.
A parent sees only their own child, a teacher only their own classes. The right comes from a relationship in the data, not from the page address.
An avatar is served by a controller after checking who is looking; the address cannot be guessed. The school logo is a plain file — it is public anyway.
Children do not have email. The teacher or school administrator resets the password — faster, and it creates no extra channel into someone else’s account.
The internet drops mid-lesson — the child finishes, the result uploads next time. Stars are not lost.
The demo runs with your children and your teacher — that shows both the product and how it fits your timetable.