The object first, the number after
The CPA approach: the child moves blocks by hand, then works with a picture, and only then sees a digit. The difference shows not in year 1 but in year 4 — on fractions.
CCSS cosmo-maths runs in schools right now. The rest follow the roadmap and are included in the same plan at no extra cost. And if a school has a programme of its own in mind, we will launch it on request.
A separate paid subject running alongside core maths. It does not replace it and does not argue with the textbook — it covers what parents go to a tutor for.
The CPA approach: the child moves blocks by hand, then works with a picture, and only then sees a digit. The difference shows not in year 1 but in year 4 — on fractions.
The school\u{2019}s curriculum lead picks the approach without changing the content of the exercises. The school gets its own signature without commissioning its own content.
The list is honest: a school plans admissions a year ahead, and a promise unmet by September costs more than a line left off a website.
Years 1–4, 42 exercise sets, 12 domains. CCSS standard, benchmarked against TIMSS Math and the national MODO monitoring. Running in schools right now.
The NGSS standard, benchmarked against TIMSS Science. The tasks are visual: classification, experiment, observation. The school subjects are world studies and science.
Cambridge Primary English, the path to Starters, Movers and Flyers. The standard parents recognise most, and the programme private schools advertise most often.
There is no standard — and that is an advantage: there is no ready competitor and no textbook either. We are porting the mechanics from our platform for learning centres, where they already run.
A school\u{2019}s own olympiads and a platform-wide ranking with personalised certificates. A talking point for parents and status for the school.
The CCSS ELA standard, benchmarked against PIRLS. It needs its own body of texts in Kazakh and Russian — the largest programme by volume, which is why it comes last.
Have a syllabus or method of your own you would like turned into exercises? That is what the platform is built for: a new programme slots into a ready machine of tasks, results and awards instead of being written from scratch. Timing and terms are discussed separately.
New programmes are included in your current plan at no extra cost. A school that joins today receives them as they launch.
They are constantly confused, and the difference is simple. A standard is the route: what a child can do by the end of each year. A framework is the target: what measures the result, and when.
So every programme has two sources. We build the syllabus on the standard and name the goal by the framework — that is the name parents recognise.
CCSS, NGSS, Cambridge Primary. The syllabus is built on them: topics, order, progression across years.
TIMSS and PIRLS are international studies at year 4. MODO is the Kazakhstani monitoring exercise. You cannot build a syllabus on them — they are a target.
The child sees a number line and places a marker. They do not need to read the wording to know what is being asked.
The practical consequence: one class can work in Kazakh, Russian and English at once, and the school never has to commission three versions of the content.
Child and parent each choose their own language. The interface is translated by a folder of dictionaries; the mechanics are never touched.
The international standard comes at it from another direction — building the concept rather than drilling the procedure. That is why parents pay for it separately, and now.
One session with your children and your teacher, and it becomes clear whether this sells to your parents or not.